Standards guide

The complete WCAG 2.1 Level A & AA checklist.

WCAG 2.1 adds 17 success criteria on top of WCAG 2.0 — most addressing mobile, low-vision, and cognitive accessibility. This guide covers all 50 Level A + AA criteria with concrete examples, the most common failures, and how each one is tested.

What is WCAG 2.1 (and why it matters)

The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, published by the W3C in June 2018, is the current de-facto accessibility standard cited in US ADA case law, the EU's European Accessibility Act, and Section 508 (US federal procurement). WCAG 2.2 (October 2023) is a superset; conforming to 2.1 AA gets you most of the way to 2.2 AA.

WCAG defines three conformance levels:

  • Level A — minimum, basic accessibility. 30 criteria in WCAG 2.1.
  • Level AA — addresses major barriers. 20 additional criteria. This is the level cited in nearly every US legal context (ADA Title II 2024 rule, Title III settlements, Section 508 Refresh).
  • Level AAA — the highest conformance level. Not required for general conformance; some criteria are infeasible for all content.

This checklist focuses on Level A + AA, the 50 criteria most teams need to verify.

1. Perceivable

Information and UI components must be presentable in ways users can perceive.

1.1 Text alternatives

  • 1.1.1 Non-text Content (A) — Every non-text element (images, icons, charts) has a text alternative. Decorative images use alt=""; informative images describe the content; functional images describe the action.

1.2 Time-based media

  • 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) (A) — Transcript for audio; transcript or audio-description for video.
  • 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) (A) — Captions for all prerecorded audio in synced media.
  • 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) (A) — Audio description or full media alternative for prerecorded video.
  • 1.2.4 Captions (Live) (AA) — Captions for live audio.
  • 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) (AA) — Audio description for prerecorded video.

1.3 Adaptable

  • 1.3.1 Info and Relationships (A) — Structure conveyed visually is programmatically determinable. Headings use <h1>-<h6>; lists use <ul>/<ol>; tables use <th> with scope.
  • 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence (A) — Reading order is programmatically determinable.
  • 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics (A) — Instructions don't rely solely on shape, color, size, or position.
  • 1.3.4 Orientation (AA) — Content works in portrait and landscape.
  • 1.3.5 Identify Input Purpose (AA) — Form fields use autocomplete for known input purposes (name, email, address).

1.4 Distinguishable

  • 1.4.1 Use of Color (A) — Color is not the only means of conveying information.
  • 1.4.2 Audio Control (A) — Auto-playing audio > 3s has a pause/stop/volume control.
  • 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) (AA) — Text contrast ratio 4.5:1 (3:1 for large text 18pt+ or 14pt bold+). The most common WCAG failure.
  • 1.4.4 Resize Text (AA) — Text can be resized up to 200% without loss of content or function.
  • 1.4.5 Images of Text (AA) — Use text instead of images of text, except for logos.
  • 1.4.10 Reflow (AA) — Content reflows at 320 CSS px width without horizontal scroll.
  • 1.4.11 Non-text Contrast (AA) — UI components and graphics have 3:1 contrast against adjacent colors.
  • 1.4.12 Text Spacing (AA) — Content adapts to user-overridden line/word/letter spacing.
  • 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focus (AA) — Tooltips and popovers are dismissable, hoverable, and persistent.

2. Operable

UI components and navigation must be operable.

2.1 Keyboard accessible

  • 2.1.1 Keyboard (A) — All functionality is keyboard-operable.
  • 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap (A) — Focus can move away from any component using only the keyboard.
  • 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcuts (A) — Single-character shortcuts can be turned off, remapped, or activate only on focus.

2.2 Enough time

  • 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable (A) — Users can extend, adjust, or disable time limits.
  • 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide (A) — Moving, blinking, scrolling, or auto-updating content can be paused.

2.3 Seizures

  • 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold (A) — Content does not flash > 3 times per second.

2.4 Navigable

  • 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks (A) — Mechanism to skip repeated content (skip-to-content link).
  • 2.4.2 Page Titled (A) — Each page has a descriptive <title>.
  • 2.4.3 Focus Order (A) — Focus order preserves meaning and operability.
  • 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) (A) — Link text alone or with context describes its purpose.
  • 2.4.5 Multiple Ways (AA) — More than one way to locate a page (nav + search + sitemap).
  • 2.4.6 Headings and Labels (AA) — Headings and labels describe topic or purpose.
  • 2.4.7 Focus Visible (AA) — Keyboard focus indicator is visible.

2.5 Input modalities

  • 2.5.1 Pointer Gestures (A) — Multipoint or path-based gestures have a single-pointer alternative.
  • 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation (A) — Actions are completed on the up-event, with abort/undo possible.
  • 2.5.3 Label in Name (A) — Accessible name matches the visible label text.
  • 2.5.4 Motion Actuation (A) — Motion-triggered functions have alternatives and can be disabled.

3. Understandable

Information and operation of the UI must be understandable.

3.1 Readable

  • 3.1.1 Language of Page (A)html lang="en" (or appropriate language) is set.
  • 3.1.2 Language of Parts (AA) — Parts in a different language are marked with lang.

3.2 Predictable

  • 3.2.1 On Focus (A) — Focus does not trigger a context change.
  • 3.2.2 On Input (A) — Input does not trigger a context change unless announced.
  • 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation (AA) — Navigation appears in the same relative order across pages.
  • 3.2.4 Consistent Identification (AA) — Components with the same functionality are identified consistently.

3.3 Input assistance

  • 3.3.1 Error Identification (A) — Errors are identified and described to the user.
  • 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions (A) — Labels or instructions are provided for user input.
  • 3.3.3 Error Suggestion (AA) — Error suggestions are provided when known.
  • 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) (AA) — For legal/financial transactions, submissions are reversible, checked, or confirmed.

4. Robust

Content must be robust enough to be reliably interpreted by user agents, including assistive technologies.

  • 4.1.1 Parsing (A)Obsolete in WCAG 2.2. Markup is well-formed.
  • 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (A) — UI components have a programmatic name, role, and value.
  • 4.1.3 Status Messages (AA) — Status messages can be programmatically determined (ARIA live regions).

The 10 most common WCAG 2.1 failures

From AccessProof scans across thousands of US sites in 2024-2025, these are the recurring failure patterns:

  1. Color contrast (1.4.3) — Light gray text on white, button text below 4.5:1 ratio.
  2. Missing alt text (1.1.1) — Product images, icons, decorative graphics without alt or with alt="image".
  3. Form inputs without labels (3.3.2)placeholder used as label; missing <label for=> linkage.
  4. Focus visible (2.4.7)outline: none applied without a custom focus indicator.
  5. Heading hierarchy (1.3.1)<h1> missing or skipped levels (h1 → h3).
  6. Link purpose (2.4.4) — "Click here", "Read more", or "Learn more" used as link text.
  7. Keyboard traps in modals (2.1.2) — Custom modal dialogs that trap focus or don't restore it.
  8. Non-text contrast (1.4.11) — Form input borders, button outlines below 3:1.
  9. Skip links (2.4.1) — No skip-to-content link, or skip link hidden incorrectly.
  10. Status messages (4.1.3) — Cart updates, error toasts not announced to screen readers.

An automated AccessProof scan flags these in 42 seconds with per-element selectors.

How to test each criterion

Each WCAG criterion has automated, semi-automated, or manual testing methods. Roughly 30-40% are reliably automatable; the rest require manual review.

  • Automated (axe-core, AccessProof) — color contrast, alt text presence, ARIA validity, parsing, basic keyboard order, link/button accessible names.
  • Semi-automated — focus visibility (automated detects missing outline; manual confirms quality), heading hierarchy (automated catches skips, manual confirms meaning).
  • Manual only — captions accuracy, cognitive load, language-of-parts marking, motion-actuation alternatives, error-prevention workflows.

The right testing workflow is: run automated scans on every commit (AccessProof in CI), manual screen-reader + keyboard testing per major release, and accessibility-aware design review for new components.

How AccessProof helps

Get a defensible WCAG 2.1 audit in 42 seconds.

Vendored axe-core 4.9.1 — same engine GOV.UK, W3C, and Deque use

Timestamped PDF with WCAG criterion citations + element selectors

Cross-mapped to WCAG 2.2 AA, Section 508, EN 301 549

Scheduled audits weekly or daily for ongoing remediation record

Zero JS on your site — read-only external scanner

REST API + CI/CD gate for shift-left compliance

FAQ

WCAG 2.1 questions.

Is WCAG 2.1 still current, or should I target WCAG 2.2?

WCAG 2.2 (October 2023) is the latest. WCAG 2.1 remains valid and is what most legal frameworks currently cite explicitly (ADA Title II 2024 rule names WCAG 2.1 Level AA). Conforming to 2.1 AA is the practical target; if you target 2.2 AA you also satisfy 2.1 AA. AccessProof scans against the full 2.2 rule set and explicitly maps each finding to both 2.1 and 2.2 criteria.

Do I need Level AAA conformance?

No. AAA is aspirational; the W3C explicitly says general-purpose conformance to AAA is not required and some AAA criteria are impossible for some content types. Target Level AA. The legal-conformance bar in US ADA cases, Section 508, and the EU EAA is Level AA.

How long does a WCAG 2.1 audit take?

AccessProof produces an automated WCAG 2.1 + 2.2 audit in about 42 seconds per URL. A full manual audit by an accessibility consultant typically takes 8-40 hours per medium-complexity site. The right workflow is to use automated audits for cadence (every commit, every week) and manual audits for periodic depth (quarterly or per major release).

Does WCAG 2.1 apply to mobile apps?

WCAG itself targets web content. For mobile native apps, the equivalent reference is the Mobile Accessibility Task Force's mapping of WCAG to native components, plus platform-specific guidelines (Apple Human Interface Guidelines accessibility, Android Accessibility). Section 508 and EAA both extend WCAG-equivalent requirements to native apps via these mappings.

What's the legal weight of an automated audit?

In US ADA cases and EU EAA contexts, automated audits are accepted as evidence of remediation activity and as a baseline conformance measure — but courts and regulators also expect manual review for the criteria automation cannot reliably test. AccessProof's PDF is admissible as the automated portion of the audit trail. Pair it with periodic manual review for full coverage.