Comparison · Equally AI alternative

Why Equally AI customers switch to AccessProof

Equally AI ships an AI-flavored accessibility overlay that auto-remediates your DOM at runtime. AccessProof runs deterministic axe-core audits and gives you timestamped, defensible evidence — without injecting anything into your site.

Quick verdict

AccessProof vs Equally AI

CriterionAccessProofEqually AIVerdict
ApproachExternal audit (axe-core 4.9.1, deterministic rule set)AI-driven overlay + runtime DOM modificationsAccessProof
ReproducibilitySame input → same audit result (deterministic)AI-mediated DOM changes vary across runs and pagesAccessProof
ADA evidenceTimestamped PDF with element selectors + WCAG citationsAI-generated statement, no per-element trailAccessProof
Site performance impactZero — never runs on your siteAI overlay payload + runtime mutations on each loadAccessProof
SetupAdd URL, get audit — no code on your siteJS snippet + AI agent configTie
CI/CD integrationREST API + JSON, block deploys on thresholdOverlay-focused; CI integration limitedAccessProof
Entry pricing$0 (Free) → $29/mo StarterPaid tiers from ~$30/mo, free trial limitedTie

Claims about Equally AI reflect public marketing as of 2026-05-19. Inaccurate? Email [email protected] — we correct factual errors.

The overlay problem

An overlay does not remove your ADA risk.

Overlay vendors market a one-line JavaScript snippet that injects a widget into the DOM and claims to "fix" accessibility at runtime. The widget toggles contrast, resizes text, and exposes an ARIA-styled menu. The underlying HTML is left untouched.

US plaintiff firms have repeatedly argued that overlays do not make a site WCAG-conformant and do not insulate operators from ADA Title III claims. Web accessibility advocates published the "Overlay Fact Sheet" (overlayfactsheet.com), now signed by 900+ accessibility professionals, stating that overlays cannot reliably fix the most common WCAG failures. Public lawsuit trackers maintained by UsableNet and Seyfarth Shaw show ADA web suits filed against sites with widgets or overlays installed continue to proceed in US federal courts.

AccessProof takes the opposite stance: we do not modify your site. We audit it, surface the exact selectors and WCAG criteria that fail, and produce a timestamped PDF you can hand to engineering, counsel, or a court.

Sources: overlayfactsheet.com · UsableNet ADA Web Lawsuit Reports (2022-2024) · Seyfarth Shaw ADA Title III News.

What AccessProof does differently

Audits, not band-aids.

Vendored axe-core 4.9.1

We ship the audit engine ourselves. Same rule set used by Deque, GOV.UK, and the W3C — 90+ rules across WCAG 2.2 A/AA/AAA, Section 508, EN 301 549.

Court-ready timestamped PDFs

Each scan produces a signed PDF with site URL, scan time (UTC), exact element selectors, WCAG criterion citations, and remediation steps. Designed to be admissible.

Scheduled scans, regression alerts

Daily, weekly, or hourly cadence. Email + Slack + webhook alerts when a regression introduces a new critical or serious issue.

Multi-site, multi-tenant

One dashboard for a portfolio. Agencies manage 25+ clients on a single Pro account; enterprises run unlimited sites on Business.

REST API + CI/CD gate

Block deploys with an accessibility threshold in your pipeline. POST a URL, get JSON back with violations, score, and a fail/pass gate.

No JavaScript on your site

AccessProof does not inject anything into your pages. We render them in Chromium and inspect — your DOM stays exactly as your team built it.

Pricing comparison

Pay for an audit, not a widget.

Free
$0/mo

1 site · monthly · HTML report

Starter
$29/mo

5 sites · weekly · PDF reports · email alerts

Pro
$79/mo

25 sites · daily · API + CI/CD · branded PDF

Equally AI

Equally AI markets paid plans starting around $30/month with AI-driven auto-remediation and a "Free" tier limited to small sites and demos. Higher tiers include manual review services.

Source: equally.ai/pricing (public marketing as of 2026-05).

Business plan ($199/mo) covers unlimited sites and hourly scans — see /pricing.

FAQ

Questions we hear from Equally AI customers.

Does AI auto-remediation make my site ADA compliant?

No. AI-driven overlays apply visual and ARIA-style patches at runtime — they don't fix the underlying HTML, and they can't produce a verifiable per-element conformance report. The DOJ ADA Title III guidance requires operators to conform to WCAG; the overlayfactsheet.com letter — signed by 900+ accessibility experts — argues overlays of any kind, AI or not, cannot reliably remediate the most common WCAG failures.

Why switch from Equally AI to AccessProof?

Three reasons: (1) determinism — AI-mediated patches vary across visits and pages, making evidence unstable; AccessProof runs the same axe-core rules every time; (2) defensibility — you get per-element selectors and WCAG citations instead of a generated statement; (3) zero runtime impact — no AI agent or JS payload on your visitors' browsers.

Can AI replace a real WCAG audit?

AI can summarize an audit, draft remediation steps, or accelerate categorization — but the audit itself needs to be deterministic and reproducible to be useful as legal evidence and as a CI gate. AccessProof uses axe-core (deterministic, peer-reviewed) for detection and reserves AI assistance for downstream tasks like report summarization where reproducibility matters less.

Does AccessProof inject anything into my site?

No. AccessProof never adds JavaScript, CSS, or DOM nodes to your pages. We render your URLs in headless Chromium on our infrastructure, run axe-core 4.9.1, and produce a PDF. Your DOM stays untouched.

Run a free WCAG audit on your site.

No widget on your DOM. No long demo call. A timestamped report in ~42s.